Insights
Client Alert
Federal Circuit Clarifies That Foreseeability Does Not Preclude the Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents
February 20, 2014
BY ERIC W. DITTMANN, ISAAC S. ASHKENAZI, & MAX H. YUSEM
On February 19, 2014, the Federal Circuit issued a unanimous decision clarifying that the foreseeability of an alleged equivalent at the time of patenting is not a bar to a finding of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, effectively removing an often-asserted noninfringement argument by alleged infringers. Ring & Pinion Service Inc. v. Arb Corp. Ltd., No. 2013-1238 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 19, 2014). Read the decision here.
Contributors
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/031f0/031f08ebc9b4fe2e2f162412c22d8f250cf3b603" alt="Image: Max H. Yusem"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42baf/42baf8f2730f7c05d2bc52c67f2eeb851f9ce393" alt="Image: Eric W. Dittmann"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b320/7b320fa8486f68f29ea5cc9ecb7c3b025e6de66d" alt="Image: Isaac S. Ashkenazi"